but it does have a history, it has a present and it has a future.and with on-line wheels spinning 200 spins per minute, it's easy to find situations of 12 in a row occuring then activating bets against it getting to 18 in a row.make sense? answer me and I appreciate all help 'cause I do not get it? Roulette 666 is the devil to my mind at the moment It is not a living thing.Help me.I do not get it.I have read and believe the odds of 18 in a row of any of the 'almost even money bets' are something like 654 000 to 1.yet.why can't we then, enter the 'game' when 12 of one of these has continually come up.and activate a betting system against it happening? I know the wheel has no memory. The wheel has no memory from spin to spin. And thus the odds are always the same – 18/37, whether the red came in ten times previously or not. In roulette, you can’t bet on what is going to happen over ten spins, you can only bet on the next spin. The important thing to understand and to get your head around is that these are odds over multiple spins.

So what happened? Roulette Odds and the Gambler’s Fallacy The odds of this happening? A mere 1 in 145,000.Īnd this gave name to the Monte Carlo Fallacy, otherwise known as the Gambler´s Fallacy, as the longer the streak went on, more and more people started piling their chips onto red. Now imagine that you were betting the Martingale that day! The odds of seeing that are 1 in 11 million, or thereabouts by the way.Īnother huge streak (this time on black) was seen by the players at the Casino in Monte Carlo who saw 26 blacks in a row on the table on 18 August 1913. The longest number of reds in a row was recorded in an American Casino in 1943 when 32 came up in a row.

But that doesn’t mean it isn’t going to happen. Pretty low odds that you´ll ever see this, in other words. A two hundred times wagering requirement applies on all bonuses and certain games contribute a different percentage to the wagering requirement.

Odds to hit red black roulette